Airport Way/Cushman Street: Base Mapping for Existing ROW - 2017

This is an intersection upgrade project that is currently scheduled for 2023 construction.  My role was to research the existing right-of-way and share the base mapping task with another R&M surveyor.  There is a lot of history with this project ranging from my 1966 arrival in Alaska and through my years at DOT&PF Northern Region. After arriving in Fairbanks in 1966, we took up residence in the Fairview Manor apartments that were located on North side of Airport Way and to the West of Cowles Street.  In 1967, Fairbanks was hit with what must have been the 100 year flood.  Nearly every house in the floodplain was damaged but as we lived at apartment 2H 7&8 on the third floor, most of our possessions were protected. I could however, look down to our garage door that had floated open and see just the white roof of our Chevy Impala.  The section of Airport Way fronting Fairview Manor was under construction with the curb and gutter having been recently poured.  I recall the limits of the flood water appeared to go up to the centerline of the divided four lane. 

Fast forward to my DOT&PF career between 1986 and 2014.  I found ROW research along Airport Way to always be frustrating.  The ROW plans would in part be based upon a fixed offset from the design centerline and in other cases be referenced to an existing platted boundary.  Where the platted boundary was to be the project ROW line, the plans neglected to show any ties between the ROW and the project centerline.  This meant that to locate the project ROW, you would first have to retrace the subdivision boundary.  Also, the control monuments from which centerline could be located were placed at odd offsets and shown only upon the construction as-built plans. The ROW plans were prepared back at the time when drafting was occasionally relegated to ROW Agents with little other work or construction hands who were separated from their projects over the winter.  The result was often that the dimensions as shown on the plat could not be used to calculate the closure on a parcel.  Occasionally you might find additional details in the acquisition plats and legal descriptions but often you were left scratching your head.  Fortunately, there must have been others like me who just hate to throw stuff away.  Back in the time these ROW plans were prepared, Civil3D, AutoCad, desk computers or even calculators with trig functions were still a few decades away.  And DOT did not seem to  adopt technology easily.  I found this out in 1986 when I had to  supply my own 8086 desktop computer with a 10mb hard disk and an amber screen to facilitate some of my tasks as ROW Engineering Supervisor.  The COGO (Coordinate Geometry) calculations performed by DOT (Dept. of Highways at the time) for the Airport Way ROW plans were hand coded on pre-printed notepads.  You would select points and then define bearings in a request to perform a bearing-bearing intersection problem.  These sheets would then be sent to Juneau where they had an IBM 360 mainframe computer.  The coding would most likely be entered on keypunch cards and then run with the resulting "green" sheets providing the completed calculations to be mailed back to Fairbanks.  It was in the Northern Region ROW Engineering archives that I found a folder of these "green" sheets for the Airport Way ROW plan COGO.  With these sheets I was able to fill in the blanks that upon the plans themselves were indecipherable.

Another accidental win came from a Thomas Engineering project for DOT to survey the Cushman Street corridor from Gaffney to Van Horn Road.  This was accomplished between 1991 and 1994.  DOT&PF projects come and go with the funding and political cycles and the Cushman project was no different.  It was to be shelved for the next couple of decades with only the odd intersection project constructed.  At the time, the typical process would have DOT take the consultant's submittals and place them in a large cardboard box such that it might come of some use in the future.  Fortunately, the project manager asked for my thoughts and I requested that the consultant's existing ROW/monument recovery survey be filed with the Recorder as a Record of Survey.  This may have been the first.  So many years later when portions of the project restarted, boundary monuments may have have been destroyed, however, we now had a sealed record of their locations from which to start our ROW plan development.  We were also able to reestablish boundaries based on 1955 and 1957 precise surveys of the Rickert Homestead Subdivision and the Fairbanks Townsite that were prepared for utility expansion design by the City of Fairbanks.  These maps were unrecorded but were clearly based on competent surveys which provided evidence of monument positions.  Not every boundary could be reestablished with certainty but the evidence we used was far better than what in some cases little more than a graphic representation according to the existing ROW plans. All in all, a very challenging project.

Date Documents
Mapping
Mapping - 2020 Gap
Mapping - Airport/Cushman
Mapping - Airport/Cushman - BLM
Mapping - Airport/Cushman - Foodland
Mapping - Airport/Cushman - Rickert
Mapping - Airport/Cushman - Townsite
Mapping - Airport Way
Mapping - Cit of Fairbanks
Mapping - Cushman/Gaffney
Mapping - Gillam/Gaffney
Mapping - Gillam/Gaffney - 1969 ROWE
Mapping - Gillam/Gaffney - Declarations of Taking
Mapping - L20 & 21 B2 Gateway
Mapping - Noble Street
 Mapping - Review
Mapping - S2 L23 B13 Rickert
Mapping - S2 L23 B13 Rickert - Boundary Law
Mapping - S2 L23 B13 Rickert - Deeds
Mapping - S2 L23 B13 Rickert - DOH
Mapping - S2 L23 B13 Rickert - FNSB
Mapping - S2 L23 B13 Rickert - Stutzmann
Mapping - South Cushman