Omnibus Quitclaim Deed Rights-of-Way: Fee or Easement - 2015

This controversy has been subject to multiple conflicting AGO Opinions and agency positions.  In June of 1959, Congress passed the Alaska Omnibus Act.  The purpose of this act was "to amend certain laws of the United States in light of the admission of the State of Alaska into the Union".  Section 21 of the Act required the transfer of "all lands or interests in lands" used in connection with the activities of the Bureau of Public Roads.  On June 30, 1959, the Secretary of Commerce executed the Omnibus Act Quitclaim Deed that referenced the routes and other properties to be conveyed to the State of Alaska.  The question for this study is: What interest did the State of Alaska receive in the highway rights-of-way conveyed by the Quitclaim Deed.  The Alaska Supreme Court has held that "The intent of the parties is the touchstone of deed interpretation and will be given effect where possible."  Did the QCD convey the entire interest held by the United States, or only that part held by the Department of Commerce, Bureau of Public Roads?

This archive includes a lot of historical documentation from the federal perspective that discusses the "Fee vs. Easement" issue and what complexities could arise if highway ROW in Alaska were to remain "withdrawals" as opposed to easements.  This was a subject of great interest to former DOH/DOT Commissioner Bruce Campbell and his extensive arguments that the state received a "fee" interest are included in this archive. I have split some document collections to keep them to under 10mb chunks.  Granted, there may be a lot of this archive that could have been culled to focus more on the specific subject, but my current mission is to get the archives posted first, and then worry about streamlining the archives at a later date.

Date Documents
43 USC 859 Fee Title
43 USC 859 Fee Title - Railroad
B. Campbell
B. Campbell - Review of AGO Opinion
Easement Vacation
Legal
Pre-Statehood
Reviewed