State v. Offshore Systems Kenai - Nikishka Beach Road - 2009

"The case arose from OSK's unilateral decision to block public access via Nikishka Beach Road to Nikishka Beach in North Kenai. In 2007, OSK, a Cook Inlet dock owner and oilfield services supplier, erected a gate and manned it with an armed security guard ahead of the westerly terminus of Nikishka Beach Access Road."  This action blocked public access to the beach from the state-owned and maintained road."  The Kenai Superior Court issued it's decision on March 11, 2010.  "Judge Moran ruled that the state road goes all the way to the beach by virtue of a number of legal instruments, and that the public also enjoys prescriptive easement to the beach on both sides of OSK's dock." (Quote from 2010 DOT&PF In-Transit newsletter)

January 1957 BPR North Kenai Vicinity Map

At the time of this case I was DOT&PF NR ROW Chief. I was requested to provide expert testimony as to the nature and validity of the existing public right-of-way for Nikishka Beach Road. One of OSK's arguments was that the any public ROW that existed for Nikishka Beach road was terminated by merger of title when the State received patent to lands partially crossed by the road. This is an important issue because it often arises in discussions of easement validity or DOT/DNR land management when it is suggested that federally granted highway easements including material sites were terminated when the State receives patent to the lands they cross. The Court disposed of this argument in their Order On Summary Judgment dated 7/9/09. "The Merger Doctrine originates from the idea that person cannot have an easement in his or her own land because their general right of ownership comprehends all possible uses.  Public easements, however, differ from private easements in the allocation of interests. Beneficial rights in publicly held easements are split into use and control rights. The right to control and manage the servitude for the benefit of the public is located in the State. The right to use the servitude rests with the public. While control of the benefit includes the right to transfer, terminate, or otherwise dispose of the servitude benefit, legal title does not trigger the doctrine of merger for the purposes of a public easement. To find otherwise would mean that all public roadways deeded to the State of Alaska by quitclaim deed by the federal government in 1959 were automatically vacated upon issuance of the federal patent for the remainder of these lands in 1962."

An appeal to the Supreme Court in 2012 affirmed the Superior Court's ruling that the 1980 State patent to the Kenai Borough reserved a valid easement for public access to the shoreline of  Cook Inlet, it did not address alternative rulings.  Ultimately, my testimony was not necessary.  So it goes.

Date Documents
Media
Research
Research - ARC/BPR
Research - ARC/BPR - Maps
Research - Issues
Research - Issues - Estoppel & Laches
Research - Issues - Meger of Title
Research - Issues - Prescription
Superior Court
Superior Court - 1/9/09 State v. OSK Documents
Superior Court - 2/11/09 State v. OSK Documents
Superior Court - 2/13/09 McLane Report
Superior Court - 2/28/11 OSK
Superior Court - 3/27/09 State v. OSK Motion
Superior Court - 3/4/09 Kenai Motion
Supreme Court